Koplin v. Village of South Orange
144 A. 588, 105 N.J.L. 492, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 251
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — JThe Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Koplin v. Village of South Orange, 144 A. 588, 105 N.J.L. 492, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 251 (N.J. 1929).
144 A. 588 (Koplin v. Village of South Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.