Kopelson v. New York Hotel Statler Co.
131 Misc. 525, 227 N.Y.S. 281, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 725
This text of 131 Misc. 525 (Kopelson v. New York Hotel Statler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kopelson v. New York Hotel Statler Co., 131 Misc. 525, 227 N.Y.S. 281, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
We do not understand how it can be validly claimed that the placing of one or more cuspidors in one of the public rooms of a hotel is negligence.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Crain, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 Misc. 525, 227 N.Y.S. 281, 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kopelson-v-new-york-hotel-statler-co-nyappterm-1928.