Kopczinski v. Union Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kopczinski v. Union Railway Co.

236 A.D. 707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 707 (Kopczinski v. Union Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kopczinski v. Union Railway Co., 236 A.D. 707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of Appellate Term affirming judgment of the Municipal Court and said judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event. The defendant’s request to charge that if the jury believed that the accident happened in the manner testified to by the motorman (the only witness for defendant as to the accident) the verdict must be for [708]*708the defendant, should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of Appellate Term affirming judgment of the Municipal Court and said judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event. The defendant’s request to charge that if the jury believed that the accident happened in the manner testified to by the motorman (the only witness for defendant as to the accident) the verdict must be for [708]*708the defendant, should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kopczinski-v-union-railway-co-nyappdiv-1931.