Kopcha v. Salladino

759 A.2d 911
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 30, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 759 A.2d 911 (Kopcha v. Salladino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kopcha v. Salladino, 759 A.2d 911 (Pa. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30 th day of AUGUST, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and the Petition to File an Amended and/or Supplemental Petition for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, limited to the following two issues:

1.) Whether the Superior Court erred in finding Petitioner’s claim of judicial abandonment waived, especially in light of DiMonte v. Neumann Medical Center, 751 A.2d 205 (Pa.Super.2000); and
2.) Whether judicial abandonment warranting the grant of a new trial occurred during the trial in the instant case.

It is further ordered that the Petition to File an Amended and/or Supplemental Petition for Allowance of Appeal shall be considered an amendment to the original Petition for Allowance of Appeal, and that no further amendments or supplements to the Petition for Allowance of Appeal will be accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Laventure
894 A.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
759 A.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kopcha-v-salladino-pa-2000.