Kopanon v. State

225 So. 3d 942, 2017 WL 3566148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 2017·No. Case No. 5D17-843·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Nicklos Michael Kopanon’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand this matter with instructions for the trial court to identify which terms of probation Kopanon violated, and to correct a scrivener’s error that incorrectly states that Kopanon admitted to violating his probation. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Brinson v. State, 866 So.2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

SAWAYA, PALMER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kopanon v. State, 225 So. 3d 942, 2017 WL 3566148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

225 So. 3d 942 (Kopanon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patt v. State
876 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Brinson v. State
866 So. 2d 1268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)