Koopman v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

188 S.W.3d 130, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 473
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 2006·No. ED 86544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Koopman and several other landowners appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of the City of O’Fallon on their petition for inverse condemnation as a result of property damage caused by flooding.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koopman v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission, 188 S.W.3d 130, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

188 S.W.3d 130 (Koopman v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gollaher
188 S.W.3d 130 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)