Koopman v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
This text of 188 S.W.3d 130 (Koopman v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
John Koopman and several other landowners appeal from the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of the City of O’Fallon on their petition for inverse condemnation as a result of property damage caused by flooding.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 S.W.3d 130, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koopman-v-missouri-highway-transportation-commission-moctapp-2006.