Koontz v. Scharf Land Development Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Koontz v. Scharf Land Development Co.

386 So. 2d 64, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 1980

DocketNo. 80-967

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 386 So. 2d 64 (Koontz v. Scharf Land Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koontz v. Scharf Land Development Co., 386 So. 2d 64, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17220 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue, which is under review by this appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(A), is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) an action for reformation of a warranty deed which seeks to change the title to real property is a local action and may properly be brought, as here, in the county where the real property is located, § 47.011, Fla.Stat. (1979); see Franklin v. Sherwood Park, Ltd. Inc., 380 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Sales v. Berzin, 212 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); and (b) the trial court, based on this record, did not abuse its discretion in declining to change the venue of this cause under Section 47.-122, Florida Statutes (1979). Hertz Corp. v. Rentz, 326 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue, which is under review by this appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(A), is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) an action for reformation of a warranty deed which seeks to change the title to real property is a local action and may properly be brought, as here, in the county where the real property is located, § 47.011, Fla.Stat. (1979); see Franklin v. Sherwood Park, Ltd. Inc., 380 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Sales v. Berzin, 212 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); and (b) the trial court, based on this record, did not abuse its discretion in declining to change the venue of this cause under Section 47.-122, Florida Statutes (1979). Hertz Corp. v. Rentz, 326 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 So. 2d 64, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koontz-v-scharf-land-development-co-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack