Koonts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Koonts v. State

43 S.W.2d 1117

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 18, 1931

DocketNo. 14507

StatusPublished

This text of 43 S.W.2d 1117 (Koonts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koonts v. State, 43 S.W.2d 1117 (Tex. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Theft, a misdemeanor, is the offense; penalty assessed' at confinement in the county jail for a period of six months.

The facts heard in the trial court are not brought up for review. The information is deemed sufficient, based upon a proper complaint. The motion to quash the complaint was properly overruled. There are no bills of exception complaining of any ruling of the court, and no errors have been perceived.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, P. J.

Theft, a misdemeanor, is the offense; penalty assessed' at confinement in the county jail for a period of six months.

The facts heard in the trial court are not brought up for review. The information is deemed sufficient, based upon a proper complaint. The motion to quash the complaint was properly overruled. There are no bills of exception complaining of any ruling of the court, and no errors have been perceived.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.W.2d 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koonts-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.