Koon v. Rushton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6239
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02523-RBH)
Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert Holland Koon seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion to stay federal proceedings pending
resolution of his state court proceedings. The court’s order also
rejected the magistrate judge’s recommendation that Koon’s entire
28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition be dismissed and recommitted the
matter to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Koon seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Koon v. Rushton (Koon v. Rushton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.