Koon v. Lafayette State Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Koon v. Lafayette State Bank

249 So. 3d 774

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 28, 2018

DocketNo. 1D18–0561

StatusPublished

This text of 249 So. 3d 774 (Koon v. Lafayette State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koon v. Lafayette State Bank, 249 So. 3d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of Appellee's Motion to Dismiss and Appellants' Response, the Court has determined that the appeal must be dismissed because the orders on appeal do not constitute an end to a separate and distinct cause of action so as to be appealable as a partial final judgment. See Jensen v. Whetstine , 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). The Motion to Dismiss is granted. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED .

Rowe, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of Appellee's Motion to Dismiss and Appellants' Response, the Court has determined that the appeal must be dismissed because the orders on appeal do not constitute an end to a separate and distinct cause of action so as to be appealable as a partial final judgment. See Jensen v. Whetstine , 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). The Motion to Dismiss is granted. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED .

Rowe, Kelsey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 So. 3d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koon-v-lafayette-state-bank-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack