Koon v. Condon

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 1, 2004
Docket04-6803
StatusUnpublished

This text of Koon v. Condon (Koon v. Condon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koon v. Condon, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6803

ROBERT HOLLAND KOON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES M. CONDON, South Carolina Attorney General,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-3101-9-12)

Submitted: November 3, 2004 Decided: December 1, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Holland Koon, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert Holland Koon seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The notice of appeal was received approximately eight days

after the expiration of the appeal period. Under Fed. R. App. P.

4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the notice is

considered filed as of the date Koon properly delivered it to

prison officials for mailing to the court. The record does not

reveal if or when Koon complied with the requirements of Fed. R.

App. P. 4(c)(1). Accordingly, we remand the case for the district

court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine

whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and

Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be

returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Koon v. Condon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koon-v-condon-ca4-2004.