Konti v. New York City Transit Authority

111 A.D.2d 1073, 490 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50300
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 20, 1985·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Kane, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 1, 1984.

Claimant, employed at a power station of the New York City Transit Authority, sustained a fractured cheek bone and injuries to his right eye when he was mugged in the subway station, some 200 yards from his specific duty station, at about 11:50 p.m. on September 9, 1980.

We agree with the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Board that claimant was in the precincts of his employment at the time of the incident in question, particularly since he was provided with a subway pass for use going to and from work (see, Matter of Husted v Seneca Steel Serv., 41 NY2d 140).

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Konti v. New York City Transit Authority, 111 A.D.2d 1073, 490 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

111 A.D.2d 1073 (Konti v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Espinoza v. City Safety Compliance Corp.
197 N.Y.S.3d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Claim of Moore v. Allied
284 A.D.2d 624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Claim of Davenport v. New York State Senate
283 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Marquette
122 A.D.2d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)