Konstantakopoulos v. Prochilo, Newman-Shaftel Associates

57 A.D.2d 582, 393 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11560

This text of 57 A.D.2d 582 (Konstantakopoulos v. Prochilo, Newman-Shaftel Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Konstantakopoulos v. Prochilo, Newman-Shaftel Associates, 57 A.D.2d 582, 393 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to compel defendant to execute a lease to certain premises, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 10, 1977, which granted plaintiff-respondent’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. It was an improper exercise of discretion for Special Term to have granted the preliminary injunction since plaintiff failed to establish a compelling right to such relief. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.2d 582, 393 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konstantakopoulos-v-prochilo-newman-shaftel-associates-nyappdiv-1977.