Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.

708 N.E.2d 173, 92 N.Y.2d 1042, 685 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1998

DecidedJanuary 14, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 708 N.E.2d 173 (Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp., 708 N.E.2d 173, 92 N.Y.2d 1042, 685 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1998 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of appellant’s motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed *1043 from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 N.E.2d 173, 92 N.Y.2d 1042, 685 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konrad-v-136-east-64th-street-corp-ny-1999.