Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.

708 N.E.2d 173, 92 N.Y.2d 1042, 685 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1998
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1999·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of appellant’s motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed *1043 from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp., 708 N.E.2d 173, 92 N.Y.2d 1042, 685 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1998 (N.Y. 1999).

708 N.E.2d 173 (Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.