Konopolsky v. Heidenreich

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Konopolsky v. Heidenreich

147 N.Y.S. 353

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.Y.S. 353 (Konopolsky v. Heidenreich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Konopolsky v. Heidenreich, 147 N.Y.S. 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

From the present state of the record it is apparent that the minds of the parties never met upon many of the essentials necessary to constitute a lease. It appears that the parties discussed some of the terms of the proposed lease, and an appointment was made to meet, later on, at the office of a lawyer for the purpose of arranging such terms and, if agreed upon, to have a lease drawn. Before the time set, however, the lessor became dissatisfied with the responsibility of the proposed lessee and the matter fell through. Under such circumstances the brokers did not earn their commissions.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

From the present state of the record it is apparent that the minds of the parties never met upon many of the essentials necessary to constitute a lease. It appears that the parties discussed some of the terms of the proposed lease, and an appointment was made to meet, later on, at the office of a lawyer for the purpose of arranging such terms and, if agreed upon, to have a lease drawn. Before the time set, however, the lessor became dissatisfied with the responsibility of the proposed lessee and the matter fell through. Under such circumstances the brokers did not earn their commissions.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 N.Y.S. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konopolsky-v-heidenreich-nyappterm-1914.