Konopka v. Bruckman
265 A.D. 1068, 40 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6948
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Ho opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lewis, J., dissents and votes to annul the determination, with the following memorandum: The conclusion of the State Liquor Authority is based wholly upon inferences which are not warranted by the proof. There is no evidence to justify the revocation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Konopka v. Bruckman, 265 A.D. 1068, 40 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
265 A.D. 1068 (Konopka v. Bruckman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kormann's Hofbrau, Inc. v. O'Connell
275 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)