Konopka v. Bruckman
265 A.D. 1068, 40 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6948
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 265 A.D. 1068 (Konopka v. Bruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Konopka v. Bruckman, 265 A.D. 1068, 40 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
Ho opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lewis, J., dissents and votes to annul the determination, with the following memorandum: The conclusion of the State Liquor Authority is based wholly upon inferences which are not warranted by the proof. There is no evidence to justify the revocation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kormann's Hofbrau, Inc. v. O'Connell
275 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 1068, 40 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konopka-v-bruckman-nyappdiv-1943.