Konnoson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Konnoson v. City of New York

254 A.D. 378, 5 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6425

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 378 (Konnoson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Konnoson v. City of New York, 254 A.D. 378, 5 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No competent evidence of a hiring of the plaintiff by any duly authorized person in the office of the corporation counsel was presented. Furthermore, there Was shown no compliance with section 419 of the Greater New York Charter.

Under such circumstances plaintiff is not entitled to recover for any alleged services rendered. (Keane v. City of New York, 88 App. Div. 542; Fifth Avenue Bank of New York v. City of New York, 250 id. 844; Lyddy v. Long Island City, 104 N. Y. 218.)

It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI