Konikson v. United States Plywood Corp.

378 P.2d 281, 233 Or. 326, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 269
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 378 P.2d 281 (Konikson v. United States Plywood Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Konikson v. United States Plywood Corp., 378 P.2d 281, 233 Or. 326, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 269 (Or. 1963).

Opinion

SLOAN, J.

Plaintiff prayed for reformation of a timber cutting contract between himself and defendant corporation. He also sought damages for an alleged failure of defendant to perform the contract as plaintiff would have [327]*327liad it reformed. The trial court found that there was no evidence to support plaintiff’s plea for reformation and dismissed the complaint.

We agree. The case is entirely factual. No issue of law is presented. The record has been examined. It is silent as to any cause for reformation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 P.2d 281, 233 Or. 326, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konikson-v-united-states-plywood-corp-or-1963.