Konig v. Bloch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Konig v. Bloch

12 A.D.2d 752, 210 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13063

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 752 (Konig v. Bloch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Konig v. Bloch, 12 A.D.2d 752, 210 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on September 30,1959 as resettled by order entered on March 24, 1960, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the facts, without costs. Intrinsically, the resettled order represents judicial acceptance and approval of the stipulation twice made in affidavits by the Chief Magistrate dated October 27, 1959 and later repeated in open court, that he would grant petitioners the benefits of the leave regulations promulgated by the Board of Estimate on June 15, 1956, without conceding “that they are entitled to any judicial pronouncement that their rights arise” from that source. Order entered on December 10, 1958, as dismisses the second cause of action in the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on September 30,1959 as resettled by order entered on March 24, 1960, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the facts, without costs. Intrinsically, the resettled order represents judicial acceptance and approval of the stipulation twice made in affidavits by the Chief Magistrate dated October 27, 1959 and later repeated in open court, that he would grant petitioners the benefits of the leave regulations promulgated by the Board of Estimate on June 15, 1956, without conceding “that they are entitled to any judicial pronouncement that their rights arise” from that source. Order entered on December 10, 1958, as dismisses the second cause of action in the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 752, 210 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konig-v-bloch-nyappdiv-1961.