Kong v. State

935 So. 2d 1278, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14026, 2006 WL 2418969
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2006·No. No. 4D06-2850·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Kong’s rule 3.800(a) motion, without prejudice to the filing of a timely and legally sufficient rule 3.850 motion addressing the claims imper-missibly raised for the first time on appeal in his initial brief.

STONE, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kong v. State, 935 So. 2d 1278, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14026, 2006 WL 2418969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

935 So. 2d 1278 (Kong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.