Konfidan v. Immotor, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 20, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-01524·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCU SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED LARI KONFIDAN, DOC #:____ DATE FILED:_ 12/20/2021 Plaintiff, 20-cv-1524 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL IMMOTOR, LLC et al., Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The magistrate judge has informed the Court that the parties have reached a settlement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by January 20, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: December 20, 2021 MARY V vAcocit New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Konfidan v. Immotor, LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Konfidan v. Immotor, LLC (Konfidan v. Immotor, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.
356 F.3d 492 (Second Circuit, 2004)