Konesky v. Keller

Montana Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 2021·No. DA 21-0040·Unpublished

Opinion

02/02/2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0040

DA 21-0040

THOMAS KONESKY, FILED Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, and Appellant, FEB 0 2 2021 Bowen Grecnw000

v. Clerk of Supreme Cou Stv-)te

KEVIN KELLER; KAREN L. REIFF; CHURCH, HARRIS, JOHNSON & WILLIAMS,P.C., and JOHN DOES A-Z;

Defendants, Counter-Plaintiffs, and Appellees, ORDER KEVIN KELLER, Third-Party Plaintiff, v.

DONITA KONESKY, Third-Party Defendant.

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Thomas Konesky has filed a notice of appeal from the order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cause No. BDV-19-0568. The appeal is from an order certified as final by the District Court pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 54(b).

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 4(4)(b), we have reviewed the District Court's certification order for cornpliance with M. R. App. P. 6(6). We conclude the court's certification order is in substantial compliance with the requirements of Rule 6(6) and our case law interpreting certification orders under Rule 54(b).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal may proceed.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel ofrecord.

DATED this '

.1--ciday of January, 2021.

o e?

Justices

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Konesky v. Keller, (Mo. 2021).

Konesky v. Keller (Konesky v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.