Konesky v. Keller
This text of Konesky v. Keller (Konesky v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
02/02/2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 21-0040
DA 21-0040
THOMAS KONESKY, FILED Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, and Appellant, FEB 0 2 2021 Bowen Grecnw000 v. Clerk of Supreme Cou Stv-)te
KEVIN KELLER; KAREN L. REIFF; CHURCH, HARRIS, JOHNSON & WILLIAMS,P.C., and JOHN DOES A-Z;
Defendants, Counter-Plaintiffs, and Appellees, ORDER
KEVIN KELLER,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
DONITA KONESKY,
Third-Party Defendant.
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Thomas Konesky has filed a notice of appeal from
the order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cause No. BDV-19-0568. The appeal is
from an order certified as final by the District Court pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 4(4)(b), we have reviewed the District Court's
certification order for cornpliance with M. R. App. P. 6(6). We conclude the court's
certification order is in substantial compliance with the requirements of Rule 6(6) and our
case law interpreting certification orders under Rule 54(b).
Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that this appeal may proceed. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel ofrecord.
DATED this ' .1--ciday of January, 2021.
o e?
Justices
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Konesky v. Keller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konesky-v-keller-mont-2021.