Kondziela v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJuly 27, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-01050
StatusUnknown

This text of Kondziela v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (Kondziela v. Costco Wholesale Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kondziela v. Costco Wholesale Corp., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 Karen L. Jacobsen - 125684 Brian P. Dolin - 182971 2 JACOBSEN & McELROY PC 2401 American River Drive, Suite 100 3 Sacramento, CA 95825 4 Tel. (916) 971-4100 Fax (916) 971-4150 5 ESERVICE@jacobsenmcelroy.com

6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and VERONA BRIDGES 8 9 Neer Lerner – (CSB – 266625) Lerner Law Firm, PC 10 2600 W. Olive Ave., #500 Burbank CA 91505-4572 11 Tel: (818) 576-8282 12 Fax: (818) 330-4072 neer@lernerlawfirm.net 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 DONNA KONDZIELIA 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17

18 DONNA KONDZIELA, ) No. 2:23-cv-1050 TLN DB 19 )

20 Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE 21 vs. ) NONDISCLOSURE OF PROPRIETARY ) AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL 22 COSTCO WHOLESALE ) INFORMATION DOCUMENTS, 23 CORPORATION; VERONA BRIDGES; ) TESTIMONY, AND THINGS AND and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, ) ORDER 24 ) Defendants. ) 25 26 WHEREAS, the parties, through their attorneys of record, jointly agree and stipulate that 27 the entry of a protective order pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) should be 28 applied to this matter: 1 WHEREAS, a protective order will expedite the flow of discovery material, facilitate the 2 prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality, and adequately protect confidential material: 3 NOW THEREFORE, having found good cause, it is hereby ORDERED THAT: 4 1. PURPOSE 5 During the course of this litigation (including pre-litigation investigation as well as 6 discovery and investigation conducted during the litigation and through trial and appeal), there 7 may be information, documents, testimony and things disclosed, discovered or produced by a 8 party or parties which at least one party considers confidential, proprietary, private or sensitive 9 in nature. A party asserting material is confidential, proprietary, private or sensitive may suffer 10 harm if such material is published, disclosed or disseminated for any purpose other than 11 investigation and preparation for the trial and appeal of this action. The parties therefore seek 12 to establish a mechanism to provide special protection from any further disclosure of such 13 material, and accordingly petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order 14 which will govern all pre-litigation investigation undertaken in the above-captioned matter, as 15 well as all discovery and investigation which has taken place up to the date this Stipulation is 16 fully executed, and which may take place hereafter, through trial and appeal. 17 2. DEFINITION OF “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL 18 “Confidential” material shall mean all documents or portions thereof (as defined in Rule 19 1001 of the Federal Rules of Evidence) that the producing party reasonably and in good faith 20 believes is subject to a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1). As a 21 general guideline, material designated “Confidential” shall be confidential and sensitive 22 information and things, specifically including material of a proprietary business nature which 23 might be of value to a potential competitor of the party holding the proprietary rights thereto, 24 and which therefore must be protected from disclosure to third parties. Confidential Material 25 shall include, but not be limited to, information, documents, testimony and tangible things, 26 regardless of how generated, stored or maintained, which any party claims in good faith to be 27 entitled to protection, including information disclosed in interrogatory responses; documents 28 identified and/or produced in response to requests for production; deposition testimony; and 1 other information and/or documents and things which any party receives, produces, exchanges 2 or discovers in connection with this action, including during its pre-litigation investigation as 3 well as during discovery and investigation which continue during the course of the litigation, 4 and specifically including materials falling within this definition which may have been received, 5 produced, exchanged or discovered by any party prior to the date this Stipulation is fully 6 executed, as well as extracts, abstracts, copies and summaries thereof. 7 3. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF MATERIAL DESIGNATED “CONFIDENTIAL” 8 (a) Information designated “Confidential” shall be used by the parties and their agents, 9 employees, representatives, consultants and experts, solely in connection with this litigation, 10 and not for any other purpose, including not for any other business, commercial, competitive 11 or litigative purpose. 12 (b) No copies, extracts or summaries of any “Confidential” material shall be made 13 except by or on behalf of counsel for use solely in connection with and during the duration of 14 this litigation. All such copies, extracts or summaries shall be treated as “Confidential” material, 15 and none shall be delivered, exhibited to, disclosed or distributed to any person or entity except 16 as specifically provided herein. 17 (c) This Stipulated Protective Order is intended solely to facilitate the preparation for 18 trial and/or appeal of this action, and nothing herein shall be construed as an admission or 19 agreement by any party that “Confidential” material hereunder constitutes confidential or 20 proprietary material. 21 (d) Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall be deemed to preclude the 22 parties from seeking permission of the Court to disclose information which has been designated 23 “Confidential” by one or more parties to this litigation on the ground that such material is in fact 24 not confidential. 25 (e) If any party seeks to file a motion on this issue, the parties agree the party seeking 26 disclosure of material asserted to be “Confidential” may, with Court approval, file such a motion 27 on shortened time. 28 /// 1 4. DESIGNATING “CONFIDENTIAL” PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 (a) WRITTEN and ELECTRONICALLY GENERATED, STORED AND/OR 3 MAINTAINED MATERIALS 4 A party may, in good faith, designate documents, materials and other written materials 5 as described in Paragraph 2, above, as “Confidential” (including but not limited to written 6 information and materials produced in written discovery responses, as well as electronically 7 generated, stored and/or maintained materials), by prominently marking the material 8 “CONFIDENTIAL” at the time such material is produced. A party may also, in good faith, 9 designate such material “Confidential” in a timely manner after it becomes known to the party 10 seeking protection that written and/or electronic materials asserted to be “Confidential” have 11 become known to or have come into the possession of another party to this litigation, or to 12 another party’s agents, employees, representatives, consultants and/or experts. 13 (b) DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE 14 A party may, in good faith, designate deposition testimony and/or evidence produced at 15 deposition as “Confidential” by orally making this designation on the record either at the 16 commencement of the deposition, at the time “Confidential” testimony is given and/or 17 “Confidential” evidence is shown to a witness and/or marked as an Exhibit, and/or before the 18 end of that day’s questioning. Following such designation, the court reporter shall mark 19 “Confidential” on the outside of each such transcript and on all portions thereof containing the 20 “Confidential” testimony and/or evidence. 21 (c) TRIAL AND MOTION TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE 22 Subject to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Serbin v. Ziebart International Corp.
11 F.3d 1163 (Third Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kondziela v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kondziela-v-costco-wholesale-corp-caed-2023.