Kondrat v. Ralph Ingersoll Publishing Co.

565 N.E.2d 882, 56 Ohio App. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1240
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1989·No. 88-L-13-150·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Christley, P.J.

This is an accelerated calendar case.

Despite appellant’s failure to include in his brief a statement of the assigned errors, as required under App. R. 16(A)(2), a review of his brief shows that: one, appellant does not dispute the merits of the trial court’s decision; and two, appellant contends the Supreme Court erred in not disqualifying the trial judge for alleged prejudice.

The Supreme Court has specifically held that a court of appeals has no authority to determine issues on the disqualification of trial judges. Beer v. Griffith (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 440, 8 O.O. 3d 438, 377 N.E. 2d 775. The Ohio Constitution grants exclusive jurisdiction over these issues to the Chief Justice and his designees. It follows from this holding, and from the general principles of appellate review, that a court of appeals cannot reverse a Supreme Court decision on this point.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Mahoney and Ford, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kondrat v. Ralph Ingersoll Publishing Co., 565 N.E.2d 882, 56 Ohio App. 3d 173, 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1240 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).

565 N.E.2d 882 (Kondrat v. Ralph Ingersoll Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fry
2012 Ohio 2602 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
Dennie v. Hurst Construction, 06ca009055 (12-8-2008)
2008 Ohio 6350 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. O'neal, 06ca0056-M (3-24-2008)
2008 Ohio 1325 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Moore, 05 Ma 178 (12-31-2007)
2007 Ohio 7215 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)