Konczal v. Hage Construction Company

776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 1, 2010 WL 27212
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 4, 2010·No. A09-1594, A09-1595·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/a/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Konczal v. Hage Construction Company, 776 N.W.2d 171, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 1, 2010 WL 27212 (Mich. 2010).

776 N.W.2d 171 (Konczal v. Hage Construction Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)