Konar v. Monro Muffler Shops of Rochester, Inc.

28 A.D.2d 642, 280 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 18, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 A.D.2d 642 (Konar v. Monro Muffler Shops of Rochester, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Konar v. Monro Muffler Shops of Rochester, Inc., 28 A.D.2d 642, 280 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Memorandum: The complaint contains two causes of action, one in negligence and the other for breach of implied warranty. It is alleged that defendant on March 12, 1963 made certain repairs to plaintiff’s automobile and on April 5, 1963 the brakes on the vehicle failed, resulting in injury to third persons. Special Term erroneously held that the first cause of action accrued on the earlier date. “ There can be no doubt that a cause of action accrued only when the forces wrongfully put in motion produce .injury.” (Schmidt v. Merchants Desp. Transp. Co., 270 N. Y. 287, 300; see, also, Durant v. Grange Silo Co., 12 A D 2d 694; Great Amer. Ind. Co. v. Lapp Insulator Co., 282 App. Div. 545.) In 1963 the six-year limitation on contract actions (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48, subd. 1) and not the three-year limit on personal injuries resulting from negligence (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6) was applicable to a claim for personal injuries arising from a breach of implied warranty. (Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp., 305 N. Y. 140.) The limitation period of actions based on such a warranty as to transactions entered into and events occurring on and after September 27, 1964 is now governed by separate statutory provision. (Uniform Commercial Code, §§ 2-725; 10-101; 10-105.) (Appeal from judgment and order of Monroe ‘Special Term granting motion to dismiss complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melfi v. Mount Sinai Hospital
64 A.D.3d 26 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Kelly v. City of Rochester
98 Misc. 2d 435 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.2d 642, 280 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/konar-v-monro-muffler-shops-of-rochester-inc-nyappdiv-1967.