Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

327 S.W.3d 5, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 2010
DocketED 94562
StatusPublished

This text of 327 S.W.3d 5 (Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 327 S.W.3d 5, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Commerce and Industry Insurance Company (CIIC) appeals from the Motion to Set Aside the October 21, 2009 Order and Judgment as Void, and Requesting that the Court Rule on CIIC’s September 28, 2009 Motion to Intervene. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
293 S.W.3d 31 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
C.M. v. Phillips
327 S.W.3d 5 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 S.W.3d 5, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/komsky-v-union-pacific-railroad-company-moctapp-2010.