Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

327 S.W.3d 5, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2010·No. ED 94562·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Commerce and Industry Insurance Company (CIIC) appeals from the Motion to Set Aside the October 21, 2009 Order and Judgment as Void, and Requesting that the Court Rule on CIIC’s September 28, 2009 Motion to Intervene. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Commerce and Industry Insurance Company (CIIC) appeals from the Motion to Set Aside the October 21, 2009 Order and Judgment as Void, and Requesting that the Court Rule on CIIC’s September 28, 2009 Motion to Intervene. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 327 S.W.3d 5, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1410 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

327 S.W.3d 5 (Komsky v. Union Pacific Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related