Komornik v. Caroca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Komornik v. Caroca

274 A.D.2d 557, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 31, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 274 A.D.2d 557 (Komornik v. Caroca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Komornik v. Caroca, 274 A.D.2d 557, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 27, 1999, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Phillips v 630 McKinley Sq. Corp., 285 App Div 18; see also, Patrick v Cho’s Fruit & Vegetables, 248 AD2d 692; Wessels v Service Mdse., 187 AD2d 837; Pizzi v Bradlee’s Div., 172 AD2d 504). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 27, 1999, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Phillips v 630 McKinley Sq. Corp., 285 App Div 18; see also, Patrick v Cho’s Fruit & Vegetables, 248 AD2d 692; Wessels v Service Mdse., 187 AD2d 837; Pizzi v Bradlee’s Div., 172 AD2d 504). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 A.D.2d 557, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/komornik-v-caroca-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack