Komornik v. Caroca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Komornik v. Caroca

274 A.D.2d 557, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 31, 2000·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 27, 1999, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Phillips v 630 McKinley Sq. Corp., 285 App Div 18; see also, Patrick v Cho’s Fruit & Vegetables, 248 AD2d 692; Wessels v Service Mdse., 187 AD2d 837; Pizzi v Bradlee’s Div., 172 AD2d 504). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), entered October 27, 1999, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Phillips v 630 McKinley Sq. Corp., 285 App Div 18; see also, Patrick v Cho’s Fruit & Vegetables, 248 AD2d 692; Wessels v Service Mdse., 187 AD2d 837; Pizzi v Bradlee’s Div., 172 AD2d 504). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Komornik v. Caroca, 274 A.D.2d 557, 715 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

274 A.D.2d 557 (Komornik v. Caroca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related