Komolov v. Segal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Komolov v. Segal

117 A.D.3d 557, 985 N.Y.S.2d 411

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 2014·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds.

Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds.

Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.

Komolov v. Segal, 117 A.D.3d 557, 985 N.Y.S.2d 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

117 A.D.3d 557 (Komolov v. Segal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related