Komolov v. Segal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Komolov v. Segal

117 A.D.3d 557, 985 N.Y.S.2d 411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.3d 557 (Komolov v. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Komolov v. Segal, 117 A.D.3d 557, 985 N.Y.S.2d 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds.

Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered August 19, 2013, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the thirteenth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The thirteenth cause of action for unjust enrichment is precluded in this case because it seeks precisely the same relief that was barred by the statute of frauds.

Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.3d 557, 985 N.Y.S.2d 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/komolov-v-segal-nyappdiv-2014.