Kominsky v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Kominsky v. State

612 S.W.2d 738, 272 Ark. 202, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1233

DecidedMarch 16, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 612 S.W.2d 738 (Kominsky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kominsky v. State, 612 S.W.2d 738, 272 Ark. 202, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1233 (Ark. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

James K. Kominsky, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Tom J. Keith, has attached an affidavit admitting that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

James K. Kominsky, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Tom J. Keith, has attached an affidavit admitting that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

612 S.W.2d 738, 272 Ark. 202, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kominsky-v-state-ark-1981.