Kolz v. Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kolz v. Rand

298 A.D.2d 982, 748 N.Y.S.2d 307

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 2002

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 A.D.2d 982 (Kolz v. Rand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kolz v. Rand, 298 A.D.2d 982, 748 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Henry, Jr., J.), entered January 8, 2001, wliich denied plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Henry, Jr., J.), entered January 8, 2001, wliich denied plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 982, 748 N.Y.S.2d 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolz-v-rand-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack