Kolz v. Rand
298 A.D.2d 982, 748 N.Y.S.2d 307
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2002·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Henry, Jr., J.), entered January 8, 2001, wliich denied plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kolz v. Rand, 298 A.D.2d 982, 748 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
298 A.D.2d 982 (Kolz v. Rand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huff v. Rodriguez
45 A.D.3d 1430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)