Kolmel Plumbing, Inc. v. Kolmel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kolmel Plumbing, Inc. v. Kolmel

448 So. 2d 577, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12603

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 1984

DocketNo. AU-212

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 448 So. 2d 577 (Kolmel Plumbing, Inc. v. Kolmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kolmel Plumbing, Inc. v. Kolmel, 448 So. 2d 577, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The court sua sponte dismissed the appeal filed in this cause on the grounds that the order appealed was a non-appealable interlocutory order. The appellants have filed a motion for rehearing alleging that there are no mature undisposed of issues to be decided except attorney’s fees. The appellee has filed no response contending that there are any other undisposed issues which are mature. The deputy commissioner is authorized to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of determining both entitlement to and amount of an attorney’s fee and the retention of jurisdiction for this purpose does not render an order interlocutory and unappealable. The order of dismissal of this cause is therefore vacated and the appeal is reinstated and will be considered on the merits.

SHIVERS, JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The court sua sponte dismissed the appeal filed in this cause on the grounds that the order appealed was a non-appealable interlocutory order. The appellants have filed a motion for rehearing alleging that there are no mature undisposed of issues to be decided except attorney’s fees. The appellee has filed no response contending that there are any other undisposed issues which are mature. The deputy commissioner is authorized to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of determining both entitlement to and amount of an attorney’s fee and the retention of jurisdiction for this purpose does not render an order interlocutory and unappealable. The order of dismissal of this cause is therefore vacated and the appeal is reinstated and will be considered on the merits.

SHIVERS, JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 So. 2d 577, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolmel-plumbing-inc-v-kolmel-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack