Kollyns v. Watson
Opinion
Kris Sarayn Kollyns appeals the district court’s judgment and order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kollyns v. Watson, No. 3:05-cv-02401-JFA, 2006 WL 2716426 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 22, 2006; entered Sept. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
216 F. App'x 304 (Kollyns v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.