Kollyns v. Doe

Fourth Circuit

Kollyns v. Doe

65 F. App'x 496

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2003·No. No. 03-6332·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kris Sarayn Kollyns appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Kollyns’ civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kollyns v. Doe, No. CA-02-672-3-17-BC (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kris Sarayn Kollyns appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Kollyns’ civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kollyns v. Doe, No. CA-02-672-3-17-BC (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kollyns v. Doe, 65 F. App'x 496 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

65 F. App'x 496 (Kollyns v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.