Kollin v. Ader

591 So. 2d 320, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12889, 1991 WL 276880
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1991·No. No. 91-1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding challenges a practice which is identical to that held unlawful in Mattson v. Kohlage, 569 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), under which, in accordance with the instructions of the administrative judge of the criminal division, the Dade County Circuit Court Clerk refuses to accept motions for filing in that division unless they are accompanied by notices of hearing. Because we reject any attempt to distinguish this situation — on the ground that it involves a criminal proceeding or otherwise — and because we find the respondents’ technical objections without merit,1 we hold, on the authority of Matt-son, that the respondent clerk is required to accept all motions tendered for filing in circuit court criminal cases, with or without accompanying notices of hearing.

It is assumed that it will not be necessary to issue a formal order to either respondent.

Mandamus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kollin v. Ader, 591 So. 2d 320, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12889, 1991 WL 276880 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

591 So. 2d 320 (Kollin v. Ader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. Ruvin
748 So. 2d 376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)