Kollias v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJuly 25, 2018
Docket16-868
StatusUnpublished

This text of Kollias v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Kollias v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kollias v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** * VACILIS KOLLIAS, * * No. 16-868V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: June 27, 2018 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Tetanus-diphtheria- AND HUMAN SERVICES, * acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine; * Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”). Respondent. * ******************** *

Joseph T. McFadden, Rawls Law Group, Norfolk, VA, for Petitioner; Ryan D. Pyles, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On June 27, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Vacilis Kollias on July 22, 2016. Petitioner alleged that the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine he received on July 26, 2013, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to suffer Guillain-Barré syndrome. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the vaccines either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged injury or any other injury, and denies that petitioner's current disabilities are the result of a vaccine-related injury.

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 16-868V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

VACILIS KOLLIAS,

Petitioner,

v. No. 16-868V Special Master Christian J. Moran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Vacilis Kollias ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the

Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a Tdap vaccine on or about July 26, 2013.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that the Tdap vaccine caused him to develop Guillain-Barre

Syndrome ("GBS") and that he experienced residual effects of this injury for more than six

months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition.

1 6. Respondent denies that the Tdap immunization is the cause of petitioner's alleged

GBS and/or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents all compensation for damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all

known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject

to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursable expenses, the money provided

pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a

strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(g) and (h).

13. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in his

individual capacity and on behalf of his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and/or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kollias v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kollias-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2018.