Kolitz v. Vazulas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kolitz v. Vazulas

251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 442, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7239

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 724 (Kolitz v. Vazulas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kolitz v. Vazulas, 251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 442, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Appe?" .endants from an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, adjudgir plaintiff and defendant George Vazulas were copartners in a restaurant j, directing the dissolution of the partnership, appointing a receiver to business and the real property upon which the business is conducted premises are adjudged to be copartnership property, subject to the I" -efendant Matilda Vazulas for moneys invested. Interlocutory judgir .uimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion there was no error of la upon the facts the judgment was not against the weight of the evidence. A' om the decision is dismissed; an appeal does not lie therefrom. Present ^'arty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appe?" .endants from an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, adjudgir plaintiff and defendant George Vazulas were copartners in a restaurant j, directing the dissolution of the partnership, appointing a receiver to business and the real property upon which the business is conducted premises are adjudged to be copartnership property, subject to the I" -efendant Matilda Vazulas for moneys invested. Interlocutory judgir .uimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion there was no error of la upon the facts the judgment was not against the weight of the evidence. A' om the decision is dismissed; an appeal does not lie therefrom. Present ^'arty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 724, 297 N.Y.S. 442, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolitz-v-vazulas-nyappdiv-1937.