Kolitch v. Grossman
This text of 56 A.D.2d 622 (Kolitch v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, upon a written lease, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 2, 1976, which granted respondent’s" motion to compel arbitration and denied his cross motion to stay arbitration. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, respondent’s motion denied, and plaintiff’s cross motion granted. The arbitration clause in the lease did not encompass this dispute. Consequently, it was error to grant the motion to compel arbitration. Rabin, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 622, 391 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolitch-v-grossman-nyappdiv-1977.