Kolinsky v. Pilz
125 A. 102, 94 N.J. Eq. 796, 9 Stock. 796, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 709
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance—The Chiee-J'ustice, Swayze, Teen-chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—14.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kolinsky v. Pilz, 125 A. 102, 94 N.J. Eq. 796, 9 Stock. 796, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 709 (N.J. 1923).
125 A. 102 (Kolinsky v. Pilz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hollander v. Abrams
132 A. 224 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Celendano v. Blazejewski
129 A. 708 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)