Kolev v. Euromotors west/the Auto Gallery

676 F.3d 867, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7277, 2012 WL 1194177
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 11, 2012·No. 09-55963·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion filed September 20, 2011, and appearing at 658 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir.2011), is withdrawn. Carver v. Lehman, 558 F.3d 869, 878-79 (9th Cir.2009) (a panel may withdraw an opinion sua sponte before the mandate issues). It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. With the opinion withdrawn, the Defendants-Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc and the Plaintiff-Appellant’s petition for rehearing are moot. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc upon the filing of a new decision by the court.

Additionally, submission of this case is vacated pending the issuance of a decision by the California Supreme Court in Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co. LLC, No. S199119.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kolev v. Euromotors west/the Auto Gallery, 676 F.3d 867, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7277, 2012 WL 1194177 (9th Cir. 2012).

676 F.3d 867 (Kolev v. Euromotors west/the Auto Gallery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krol v. FCA US, LLC
273 So. 3d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Krusch v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.
34 F. Supp. 3d 584 (M.D. North Carolina, 2014)
Christine Seney v. Rent-a-Center, Inc.
738 F.3d 631 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
In re Apple iPhone 3G Products Liability Litigation
859 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (N.D. California, 2012)