Kolesky v. Kolesky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kolesky v. Kolesky

281 A.D. 866, 120 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3584

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 866 (Kolesky v. Kolesky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kolesky v. Kolesky, 281 A.D. 866, 120 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified so as to reduce the counsel fee to $200 and, as so modified, affirmed. The amount allowed is excessive. Trial of this action should be had without further delay. No opinion. Present — ■ Dore, J. P., Cohn, Van Voorhis, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.; Van Voorhis, J., dissents and votes to modify so as to direct payment of $25 per week by defendant for the support of the child and to deny the motion insofar as it sought support for plaintiff and counsel fee upon the ground that plaintiff has failed to show reasonable prospect of success.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified so as to reduce the counsel fee to $200 and, as so modified, affirmed. The amount allowed is excessive. Trial of this action should be had without further delay. No opinion. Present — ■ Dore, J. P., Cohn, Van Voorhis, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.; Van Voorhis, J., dissents and votes to modify so as to direct payment of $25 per week by defendant for the support of the child and to deny the motion insofar as it sought support for plaintiff and counsel fee upon the ground that plaintiff has failed to show reasonable prospect of success.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 866, 120 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolesky-v-kolesky-nyappdiv-1953.