Koleno v. Koleno
This text of Koleno v. Koleno (Koleno v. Koleno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Koleno v. Koleno, 2026-Ohio-1876.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY
CHRISTINA KELLY KOLENO, CASE NO. 2026-A-0013
Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas
WILLIAM T. KOLENO, II, Trial Court No. 2024 DR 00475 Defendant-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
Decided: May 21, 2026 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Dennis D. Decamillo, Decamillo Law, L.L.C., 1027 Lake Avenue, Ashtabula, OH 44004 (For Plaintiff-Appellant).
Malcolm Stewart Douglas, 113 North Chestnut Street, Jefferson, OH 44047 (For Defendant-Appellee).
EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.
{¶1} On March 5, 2026, appellant, Christina Kelly Koleno, through counsel, filed
a notice of appeal from a February 26, 2026 judgment of the Ashtabula County Court of
Common Pleas. In that entry, the trial court denied her motion to set aside the
magistrate’s order and denied her motion to stay.
{¶2} An appellate court may only consider appeals from final judgments or
orders. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d 92, 96 (1989). Ohio Const., art. IV, § 3(B)(2)
provides that a trial court’s judgment can only be immediately reviewed by an appellate
court if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Tamarac Apts., LLC v. Austin, 2025- Ohio-2737, ¶ 4 (11th Dist.). If a lower court’s order is not final, an appellate court has no
jurisdiction to review the matter, and it must be dismissed. Id.
{¶3} A dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 41(B)(3), “operates as an adjudication upon
the merits unless the court, in its order for dismissal, otherwise specifies.” Generally, a
dismissal without prejudice constitutes “an adjudication otherwise than on the merits” with
no res judicata bar to refiling the suit. Heart v. Ferron, 2021-Ohio-2184, ¶ 3 (11th Dist.).
This court has stated that a dismissal without prejudice leaves a party in the same position
the party would have been in prior to the action being filed. Id. Furthermore, a dismissal
without prejudice is not a final appealable order because a party may refile or amend a
complaint. Id.
{¶4} In the present matter, because the trial court’s dismissal was without
prejudice, appellant cannot now appeal. Since she may have the ability to refile her
complaint, the trial court’s dismissal without prejudice is not a final appealable order.
Accordingly, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
{¶5} Appeal dismissed.
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,
SCOTT LYNCH, J.,
concur.
PAGE 2 OF 3
Case No. 2026-A-0013 JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, this appeal is
hereby sua sponte dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Costs to be taxed against appellant.
JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI
JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON, concurs
JUDGE SCOTT LYNCH, concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PAGE 3 OF 3
Case No. 2026-A-0013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Koleno v. Koleno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koleno-v-koleno-ohioctapp-2026.