Kolars v. Reznicek

224 N.W. 854, 177 Minn. 616, 1929 Minn. LEXIS 1106
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 12, 1929·No. No. 27,120.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to enjoin three defendant officers of a domestic fraternal association from accepting applications of women or girls for membership in the association; from certifying any such applicants for initiation in the association; and from issuing' to any such applicant a benefit or any certificate of membership therein unless and until the admission of women and girls is duly authorized by the supreme lawmaking body of the association. A demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts- sufficient to constitute a cause of action was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 3482, provides in part:

“No action or proceedings to discontinue or enjoin, in whole or in part, the business or methods of any such domestic association, * * * shall be entertained by any court, except on the suit of the attorney general of this state.” See also G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 3481, as to powers of insurance commissioner.

There must be an affirmance in this case under the authority of Baird v. Modern Samaritan, 162 Minn. 274, 202 N. W. 498.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kolars v. Reznicek, 224 N.W. 854, 177 Minn. 616, 1929 Minn. LEXIS 1106 (Mich. 1929).

224 N.W. 854 (Kolars v. Reznicek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baird v. the Modern Samaritan
202 N.W. 498 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)