Kolacki v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kolacki v. State

246 A.D. 566

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1935

DocketClaim No. 18711

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 566 (Kolacki v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kolacki v. State, 246 A.D. 566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for a new trial on the ground that from the undisputed evidence it appeared that the accident happened upon an approach to the bridge. (The judgment is for defendant in [567]*567action to recover for injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk. The order denies a motion to reopen the case.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, and Crosby, JJ. [136 Misc. 239.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for a new trial on the ground that from the undisputed evidence it appeared that the accident happened upon an approach to the bridge. (The judgment is for defendant in [567]*567action to recover for injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk. The order denies a motion to reopen the case.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, and Crosby, JJ. [136 Misc. 239.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolacki-v-state-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack