Kolacki v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kolacki v. State

246 A.D. 566

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1935·No. Claim No. 18711·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for a new trial on the ground that from the undisputed evidence it appeared that the accident happened upon an approach to the bridge. (The judgment is for defendant in [567]*567action to recover for injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk. The order denies a motion to reopen the case.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, and Crosby, JJ. [136 Misc. 239.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for a new trial on the ground that from the undisputed evidence it appeared that the accident happened upon an approach to the bridge. (The judgment is for defendant in [567]*567action to recover for injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk. The order denies a motion to reopen the case.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, and Crosby, JJ. [136 Misc. 239.]

Kolacki v. State, 246 A.D. 566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 566 (Kolacki v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related