Kolacek v. Klevenhagen
This text of Kolacek v. Klevenhagen (Kolacek v. Klevenhagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-20176 Summary Calendar
PAUL KOLACEK,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHNNY J. KLEVENHAGEN, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-91-1196)
November 30, 1995 Before KING, GARWOOD and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*
PER CURIAM:
Paul Kolacek appeals from the district court’s dismissal of
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion questioning the district court’s
dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Assuming timely notice
of appeal, Kolacek has in any event not demonstrated that the
district court abused its discretion in dismissing the Rule 60(b)
motion, whether that filed January 3, 1995, or that filed January
25, 1995. Accordingly, we affirm.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kolacek v. Klevenhagen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kolacek-v-klevenhagen-ca5-1995.