Kokubu v. Telford

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 3, 2025
DocketCAAP-23-0000557
StatusPublished

This text of Kokubu v. Telford (Kokubu v. Telford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kokubu v. Telford, (hawapp 2025).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 03-OCT-2025 07:59 AM Dkt. 70 OAWST

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DEVIN A. KOKUBUN; RANDELL K. NEIZMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and CRYSTAL A. LEDBETTER; ANGEL MACANAS, JR.; AND EDNA K. MACANAS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RAY R. TELFORD; LINDA C. TELFORD, Defendants-Appellees, and JERRY L. GOODALE, Defendant-Cross Claim Plaintiff-Appellee, and JOSEPH D. RAGOCOS, JR., Defendant-Cross claim Plaintiff-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Claim Plaintiff-Appellee, and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant-Cross Claim Defendant-Appellee, and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Third Party Defendant-Appellee, and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 3CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, and Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the September 29, 2025 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice of Appeal (Stipulation NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

for Dismissal), filed by Defendant-Cross Claim Plaintiff- Appellee Jerry L. Goodale, Defendant-Cross Claim Plaintiff-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee Joseph D. Ragocos, Jr., and Defendant- Cross Claim Plaintiff-Appellee Freedom Mortgage Corporation, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and represent that each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the Stipulation for Dismissal is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal is approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in this appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 3, 2025.

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kokubu v. Telford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kokubu-v-telford-hawapp-2025.