Kokowsky v. Curtis
This text of 283 A.D. 996 (Kokowsky v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We feel that under the circumstances presented in the pleading the question of whether or not plaintiff has a cause of action should be determined after a development of the facts upon the trial. All concur, except Piper, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting the motion. (Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 996, 130 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kokowsky-v-curtis-nyappdiv-1954.