Kokotoff v. Sharer
188 A.D. 894
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., voted for reversal for the purpose of maintaining .his dissent in Goldberg v. Borden’s Condensed Milk Co. (185 App. Div. 222) until that question is passed upon by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kokotoff v. Sharer, 188 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
188 A.D. 894 (Kokotoff v. Sharer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldberg v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.
185 A.D. 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)