Kokotoff v. Sharer
188 A.D. 894
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1919
StatusPublished
This text of 188 A.D. 894 (Kokotoff v. Sharer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kokotoff v. Sharer, 188 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Rich, J., voted for reversal for the purpose of maintaining .his dissent in Goldberg v. Borden’s Condensed Milk Co. (185 App. Div. 222) until that question is passed upon by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goldberg v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.
185 A.D. 222 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 A.D. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kokotoff-v-sharer-nyappdiv-1919.