Koken v. Steinberg

834 A.2d 1103
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 9, 2003·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2003, the above-captioned appeal is quashed as it is an appeal from an interlocutory order. Rule 341, Pa.R.A.P. The Application for Stay Pending Appeal is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koken v. Steinberg, 834 A.2d 1103 (Pa. 2003).

834 A.2d 1103 (Koken v. Steinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webber v. Erie Insurance Exchange
34 Pa. D. & C.5th 364 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)
Todd Heller, Inc. v. Cardinal Group
33 Pa. D. & C.5th 403 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)
Sovereign Bank v. Valentino
914 A.2d 415 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Boyd v. Rockwood Area School District
907 A.2d 1157 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Commonwealth v. Peoples Benefit Services, Inc.
895 A.2d 683 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)