Kokancoal Co. v. Hasten
Opinion
In an action brought to recover damages for the conversion of personal property and for goods sold and delivered, order denying plaintiff’s motion to compel the respondents, Seherzer and Lilling, to deposit with the sheriff of New York county the sum of $5,000, the amount of cash bail received from the former attorney for Seherzer, during the pendency of a certain stay issued by this court, or in the alternative to punish the respondents for contempt of court, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
250 A.D. 771 (Kokancoal Co. v. Hasten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.